Prediction of Julie Richardson vs Ruth Seeman Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Richardson vs R. Seeman

Julie Richardson

NZL

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

102

Best Rank

212

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Ruth Seeman

NZL

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

102

Best Rank

212

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Richardson 1 - 0 Seeman

They have played 3 sets in total, with Julie Richardson winning 2 and Ruth Seeman winning 1. The last match between Julie Richardson and Ruth Seeman was at the Canberra CH, 14-04-1986, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with Julie Richardson getting the victory 5-7 6-1 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Richardson	1
Seeman	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) Canberra CH(04-14-86)

Stats

Julie Richardson

Ruth Seeman

J. Richardson vs R. Seeman H2H Profile

J. Richardson	Stats	R. Seeman
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
50.00% (173-173)	Career Total W/L	49.65% (70-71)
1	Grass	0
4	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

J. Richardson vs R. Seeman Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Julie Richardson has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Ruth Seeman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Julie Richardson, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ruth Seeman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Julie Richardson has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ruth Seeman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Julie Richardson has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Ruth Seeman winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Julie Richardson has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 67/39), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 6/12). Ruth Seeman has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 11/9), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 38% (W/L 5/8).
Player level: In the last year, Julie Richardson has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Ruth Seeman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Julie Richardson winning 1 times and Ruth Seeman being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Julie Richardson winning 2 and Ruth Seeman winning 1.
The last match between Julie Richardson and Ruth Seeman was at the Canberra CH, 14-04-1986, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with Julie Richardson getting the victory 5-7 6-1 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Julie Richardson has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Ruth Seeman has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Julie Richardson has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ruth Seeman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Julie Richardson has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ruth Seeman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Julie Richardson vs Ruth Seeman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Richardson vs R. Seeman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. Richardson	Stats	R. Seeman
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
17	Games Won	11
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

J. Richardson Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Eastbourne - 13-06-1994
Q2 Emily BondE. Bond	W	6-2 6-1	Stats
R2 Joannette KrugerJ. Kruger	L	6-7 6-2 6-1	Stats
Q1 Sylvia SchenckS. Schenck	W	6-2 6-4	Stats
ITF San Luis Potosi 50K - 02-05-1994
R3 Larissa SchaererL. Schaerer	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
Indian Wells - 21-02-1994
Q1 Jolene WatanabeJ. Watanabe	W	5-7 7-5 6-3	Stats

View All

R. Seeman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Wellington - 04-02-1991
Q3 Miriam OremansM. Oremans	L	6-0 6-1	Stats
Q2 Stacey SchefflinS. Schefflin	W	6-2 0-1 RET	Stats
Q1 Ann DevriesA. Devries	W	6-3 6-1	Stats
Auckland - 28-01-1991
Q1 Petra SchwarzP. Schwarz	L	6-3 3-6 6-3	Stats
ITF Milan - 23-07-1990
R3 Magdalena SimkovaM. Simkova	L	6-3 7-6	Stats

View All

J. Richardson vs R. Seeman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. Richardson	Stats	R. Seeman
50.00% (173/173)	YTD Win/Loss	49.65% (70/71)
50.82% (403/390)	Sets Win/Loss	48.92% (158/165)
50.25% (3657/3620)	Games Win/Loss	50.08% (1474/1469)
47.59% (79/87)	Hard Win/Loss	49.25% (33/34)
33.33% (6/12)	Clay Win/Loss	52.78% (19/17)
11.11% (1/8)	Indoor Hard W/L	40.00% (2/3)
63.21% (67/39)	Grass Win/Loss	55.00% (11/9)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
396.66	Average Opponent Rank	415.16
40.00% (2/3)	Slam W/L	66.67% (2/1)
21.43% (3/11)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
68.04% (66/31)	Challenger W/L	54.55% (42/35)
45.24% (19/23)	Futures W/L	16.67% (1/5)
50% (172/342)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	49% (66/135)
57% (17/30)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	22% (2/9)
46% (49/106)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (25/50)
79% (180/142)	1st Set Won, Won Match	78% (65/51)
21% (180/37)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	20% (65/13)
19% (164/31)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	21% (73/15)